We have dialogs between Confucius and Lao Tzu, recorded out of aether, I would guess, by some devoted Taoist decades after both were dead, but still it can be delightful to be served a steaming cup, lovingly prepared according to the ancient ways, and after rituals of gratitude and thanks, to take a sip and savor: tea!
I think there are good points here but wild over generalizations. If we follow the advice of the article iself, there is a need for rigorous thinking and exploring about very complex social and cultural movements, like a stone slowly sinking to the bottom of a river.
I find it ironic that a populist article is written to criticize poplulism.
This feels to me like a return to the 70's when the major criticism of emerging "New Age" spirituality was that is was a form of "dilletantism", and not grounded enough in real
traditions. I always argued in any form that emerges there will be shadow but real light at the center.
Catholiscism, for example, has been one of the greatest blights in the history of humanity, yet it has produced some of its greatest Saints.
Finding the "self" is an exercise in futility. The best one can hope to find is to discover what St. Francis pointed out: "What we are looking for is what is looking." The same goes for "self" improvement. It's an illusive target. What we can affect is our actions. Via right action we find ourselves in right relation. Everything else follows.
A lot of “nuggets” of wisdom - thank you. In difficult work I think of the pan mining analogy (a west thing I guess). You have to sort through a lot of mud, grit, sand, rocks to find those couple glints of gold. It’s work, it’s a process.
We have dialogs between Confucius and Lao Tzu, recorded out of aether, I would guess, by some devoted Taoist decades after both were dead, but still it can be delightful to be served a steaming cup, lovingly prepared according to the ancient ways, and after rituals of gratitude and thanks, to take a sip and savor: tea!
Yes! 🙌
Thank you.
I think there are good points here but wild over generalizations. If we follow the advice of the article iself, there is a need for rigorous thinking and exploring about very complex social and cultural movements, like a stone slowly sinking to the bottom of a river.
I find it ironic that a populist article is written to criticize poplulism.
This feels to me like a return to the 70's when the major criticism of emerging "New Age" spirituality was that is was a form of "dilletantism", and not grounded enough in real
traditions. I always argued in any form that emerges there will be shadow but real light at the center.
Catholiscism, for example, has been one of the greatest blights in the history of humanity, yet it has produced some of its greatest Saints.
Finding the "self" is an exercise in futility. The best one can hope to find is to discover what St. Francis pointed out: "What we are looking for is what is looking." The same goes for "self" improvement. It's an illusive target. What we can affect is our actions. Via right action we find ourselves in right relation. Everything else follows.
Who is the doer in all of this?
A lot of “nuggets” of wisdom - thank you. In difficult work I think of the pan mining analogy (a west thing I guess). You have to sort through a lot of mud, grit, sand, rocks to find those couple glints of gold. It’s work, it’s a process.