Navigating the maze of modern life often feels like walking through a minefield of ideological traps. Everywhere we turn, someone is waiting to challenge our beliefs, ready to pounce on any perceived slight against their worldview.
In this hyper-connected period, where opinions are broadcasted with the ferocity of a thousand megaphones, I find solace in the ancient wisdom of Taoism, particularly in the art of camouflage.
Chuang Tzu once said, "Only the perfect man can go about the world without attracting attention to himself." This principle of camouflage resonates deeply with me, serving as a guiding light in my interactions, especially on contentious issues such as politics, religion, or ethics.
The Taoist view of camouflage isn’t about deceit or cowardice, it’s about maintaining harmony and practicing compassion and respect over the need to be right.
Living in a society where labels are worn like badges of honor—liberal or conservative, Christian or non-Christian, Jew or Muslim, pro-choice or pro-life—it's easy to get swept up in the fervor of identity politics. However, I strive to avoid such confrontations, recognizing that these labels often serve more to divide than to enlighten.
Camouflage, to me, means keeping my beliefs to myself, not because I lack conviction, but because I value peace and understanding more.
Confucius once remarked on the virtue of restraint, a sentiment echoed in the teachings of many Eastern philosophers. This restraint is not about suppressing my true self but about choosing my battles wisely.
Social media, a breeding ground for discord, tempts me daily to weigh in on heated debates. Yet, I’ve developed a practice I call the "1-minute rule"—a moment of contemplation to assess the worth of engaging in a likely futile back-and-forth. This pause often reveals that entering the fray would be more about feeding my ego than fostering any real dialogue.
When I do find myself in the rare position of needing to extricate from a disagreement, I resort to a simple, disarming phrase: "I’m not attached to being right." This statement, borrowed from Buddhist teachings, helps diffuse tension and signals my intent to prioritize the relationship over the argument. It’s a reminder that winning a debate rarely changes hearts and minds, but demonstrating respect and humility can leave a lasting impact.
Lao Tzu, often regarded as the "First Philosopher of Camouflage," teaches that recognizing the difference between individual values and societal norms is crucial. By embracing our natural self-interest without flaunting it, we can avoid the animosity that comes from appearing selfish or contrarian.
Camouflage, in this sense, is about living authentically yet unobtrusively, ensuring our actions speak louder than our words.
This approach to life doesn't mean I never express my opinions or stand up for what I believe in. It means I choose my moments carefully, understanding that true influence often comes through quiet examples rather than loud proclamation. By practicing this subtlety, I aim to cultivate a space where compassion and respect hold higher stead than the need to prove a point.
In a world obsessed with being seen and heard, I find strength in the Taoist wisdom of blending in. Camouflage allows me to navigate life's complexities with grace, focusing on what truly matters: maintaining inner peace, showing compassion, and respecting the infinite universe of human experience.
Become a paid financial supporter of the Chocolate Taoist and gain free access to my 52-week “Nomadic Wisdom Journaling” program. Here you’ll discover the power of journaling that has guided me for over 35 years. Through our one-on-one work, I’ll help you unlock your inner wanderer, find inner clarity, and become more expansive in your life pursuits.
“This approach to life doesn't mean I never express my opinions or stand up for what I believe in. It means I choose my moments carefully, understanding that true influence often comes through quiet examples rather than loud proclamation. By practicing this subtlety, I aim to cultivate a space where compassion and respect hold higher stead than the need to prove a point.”
And herein lies a dilemma I face almost daily in this current world of ours—the Taoist approach vs. the moral obligation I feel I have, as taught by strong moral leaders like Elie Wiesel and even MLK Jr. I understand the attraction to camouflage oneself in the interest of cultivating harmony; and yet real evil and vile manipulation, lies, and bigotry is sadly becoming normalized now. Wiesel compels us to stand up strong and speak out vigorously against such hatred, otherwise those who don’t “play the game” that Taoists play (because THEY DON’T CARE about the rules of civility) will simply run away with the competition and win in the end. We’ve seen this play out in the atrocities of the Nazi Germany Wiesel lived through, and we’re seeing it play out now in our own country. I do know that if that certain man who can never be a moral leader of the people is re-elected, I will have to go in full retreat and live more fully as a Taoist in solitude. Ironically, it will be the only way I can see to keep my sanity. But it pains me to know I might have to extricate myself from society, taking with me any influence I have for younger generations. If more like-minded people did exactly that, I worry about the future of this place, this idea we have called America.
D-M, I don’t know if I have a question here or not—I’m still searching for strong leaders who explicitly understand the deep nuances of The Tao’s teachings while standing firmly, proudly, and loudly in support of a Union founded upon the ideals of democracy. So I continue to use this filter as I read and reread each translation of the Tao Te Ching that I have trusting that at some point, Lao Tzu’s wisdom will illuminate a way out of this dark dilemma in which I find myself entangled. When does one cast aside one’s camo in order to defend love over fear, kindness over hatred, or calm over chaos?
It’s also not lost on me at all that, as a Black man in our society, I know you have faced these kinds of issues on a more consistent and deeply personal and intimate way that I will ever face in my own life as a privileged white male. Sadly, many times, the color of one’s skin won’t allow for camouflage—ironically, the color of my skin allows for just that whenever I choose. Have you written to this theme? Could you use your finger to point me to a clearer, wiser moon?
“This approach to life doesn't mean I never express my opinions or stand up for what I believe in. It means I choose my moments carefully, understanding that true influence often comes through quiet examples rather than loud proclamation. By practicing this subtlety, I aim to cultivate a space where compassion and respect hold higher stead than the need to prove a point.”
And herein lies a dilemma I face almost daily in this current world of ours—the Taoist approach vs. the moral obligation I feel I have, as taught by strong moral leaders like Elie Wiesel and even MLK Jr. I understand the attraction to camouflage oneself in the interest of cultivating harmony; and yet real evil and vile manipulation, lies, and bigotry is sadly becoming normalized now. Wiesel compels us to stand up strong and speak out vigorously against such hatred, otherwise those who don’t “play the game” that Taoists play (because THEY DON’T CARE about the rules of civility) will simply run away with the competition and win in the end. We’ve seen this play out in the atrocities of the Nazi Germany Wiesel lived through, and we’re seeing it play out now in our own country. I do know that if that certain man who can never be a moral leader of the people is re-elected, I will have to go in full retreat and live more fully as a Taoist in solitude. Ironically, it will be the only way I can see to keep my sanity. But it pains me to know I might have to extricate myself from society, taking with me any influence I have for younger generations. If more like-minded people did exactly that, I worry about the future of this place, this idea we have called America.
D-M, I don’t know if I have a question here or not—I’m still searching for strong leaders who explicitly understand the deep nuances of The Tao’s teachings while standing firmly, proudly, and loudly in support of a Union founded upon the ideals of democracy. So I continue to use this filter as I read and reread each translation of the Tao Te Ching that I have trusting that at some point, Lao Tzu’s wisdom will illuminate a way out of this dark dilemma in which I find myself entangled. When does one cast aside one’s camo in order to defend love over fear, kindness over hatred, or calm over chaos?
It’s also not lost on me at all that, as a Black man in our society, I know you have faced these kinds of issues on a more consistent and deeply personal and intimate way that I will ever face in my own life as a privileged white male. Sadly, many times, the color of one’s skin won’t allow for camouflage—ironically, the color of my skin allows for just that whenever I choose. Have you written to this theme? Could you use your finger to point me to a clearer, wiser moon?