Is Harmony Achievable in a World of Conflict?
Reflections From Lao Tzu, Sun Tzu, and Other Eastern Philosophical Figures
What is the best route to resolving the conflicts that not only surround us but also penetrate the very fabric of our societies?
This question, timeless and universal, might find its answer in the philosophical echoes of ancient China, through the teachings of Lao Tzu and Sun Tzu, interwoven with modern dilemmas such as the civil unrest we’re seeing today at colleges and universities nationwide.
Lao Tzu, the father of Taoism, advocates for a path of least resistance, teaching that the soft and flexible will overcome the hard and rigid. This approach, when applied to conflict resolution, suggests a path of acknowledgment and empathy.
From this viewpoint, conflict arises when people feel unrecognized; their identities and voices stifled. They then seek visibility through whatever means available, even if it leads to chaos or violence.
We’ve seen this played out in various forms, including the recent waves of protests and disruptions within our academic institutions. Students and faculty alike, feeling marginalized or unheard, turn towards actions that force acknowledgment from the wider community and authority figures.
On the other side of the philosophical spectrum, Sun Tzu’s "The Art of War" teaches that conflict is an art that requires strategy and foresight. Unlike Lao Tzu's passive and introspective approach, Sun Tzu emphasizes understanding those we are in conflict with — which in the context of civil unrest, translates to getting our arms around the underlying causes of dissatisfaction and unrest.
He posits that victory comes from knowing when to fight and when to refrain, suggesting that effective conflict resolution often requires proactive engagement rather than passive acknowledgment.
My personal reflections on acknowledgment align with these teachings, particularly in the context of recent campus unrest. When students at universities across the nation feel their concerns about racial injustice, gender inequality, or any form of marginalization are disregarded, they often resort to more drastic forms of expression.
This is a direct testament to the need for legitimate acknowledgment. If people’s voices are recognized in a manner they deem genuine, the urge to escalate their actions into something disruptive will often diminish.
Further exploring Eastern philosophy, the Buddhist concept of "Middle Way" provides additional insights into conflict resolution. This principle advocates for a balanced approach, avoiding the extremes of self-indulgence and self-mortification. Applied to conflicts, this could mean finding a pragmatic balance between outright confrontation and total withdrawal, acknowledging grievances while also working constructively and peacefully towards solutions.
Incorporating these Eastern philosophies into modern conflict resolution strategies suggests a composite approach: one where empathy and strategic engagement are balanced.
For example, in a university setting, administration might employ Lao Tzu’s teachings by openly acknowledging and legitimizing student concerns through forums and direct dialogues. Concurrently, using Sun Tzu’s strategies, they might also proactively address potential triggers for unrest before they escalate into larger issues.
The efficacy of this approach is contingent on the authenticity and the commitment of the involved parties to engage deeply with the concerns at hand. Both sides must see each other not as adversaries but as partners in a shared quest for a harmonious campus environment.
It’s here where the ancient wisdom of both Lao Tzu and Sun Tzu can guide modern strategies, advocating for a path that combines acknowledgment with proactive, strategic engagement.
In conclusion, resolving conflicts, whether on the global stage or within the microcosm of university campuses, requires a blend of acknowledgment, strategic foresight, and genuine engagement.
By drawing on the ancient wisdom of Lao Tzu and Sun Tzu, and integrating these with modern perspectives and challenges, we can navigate the tumultuous waters of conflict towards a more peaceful and understanding world.
The key lies not just in seeing and hearing the aggrieved but in listening deeply and responding thoughtfully, a process that can transform potential discord into lasting harmony.
The Chocolate Taoist is a reader-supported publication. To receive my weekly reflections and aid my independent writing journey, please consider becoming a subscriber or member supporter.
Every little bit counts.
PS: My book is set to release on September 1, 2024. A free copy will be sent to all paid member supporters.
Thanks for taking my question seriously. This piece is truly exemplary—thank you for your passion. You deserve a wider readership.
I just paused your podcast from your interview with Jonathan Eig. I’m prompted to write because as I was reading this post, MLK, Jr. popped into my mind in the form of a question, so I’ll ask you. I’ve read some MLK, Jr. biography in addition to other works capturing the history of that profound Civil Rights era, but do you know if King was an admirer or reader of Taoist philosophy? I know he admired Gandhi, and Thoreau (I believe), Maybe the answer will be later in the podcast—so I’ll get back to it now.